Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT affirmed that the TPO lawfully included Comparable Company A in the comparable set for transfer pricing purposes, finding functional comparability with the assessee's provision of IT-enabled services notwithstanding lower turnover, and held that the CIT(A)'s exclusion was unsustainable. The ITAT also addressed the CIT(A)'s direction regarding Comparable Companies B and C and the working-capital adjustment, noting the assessee's appeal-effect submission to the AO; the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication on those issues. The appeal is allowed in part for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration consistent with the Tribunal's findings.
The ITAT affirmed that the TPO lawfully included Comparable Company A in the comparable set for transfer pricing purposes, finding functional comparability with the assessee's provision of IT-enabled services notwithstanding lower turnover, and held that the CIT(A)'s exclusion was unsustainable. The ITAT also addressed the CIT(A)'s direction regarding Comparable Companies B and C and the working-capital adjustment, noting the assessee's appeal-effect submission to the AO; the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication on those issues. The appeal is allowed in part for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration consistent with the Tribunal's findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.