Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC allowed the appeal and set aside the Tribunal's order, holding that the importer was entitled to concessional basic customs duty only upon satisfaction of the condition precedent: declaration of place of origin and production of a Certificate of Origin conforming to the Customs Tariff rules governing determination of origin under the India-Korea PTA. The Court found the Certificate's exporter declaration (Clause 12) and customs certification (Clause 13) demonstrated origin in the Republic of Korea, and that the Tribunal erred in treating the record as deficient. The matter is remitted insofar as necessary to the proper officer for verification consistent with the SC's findings and grant of benefit if origin is established.
SC allowed the appeal and set aside the Tribunal's order, holding that the importer was entitled to concessional basic customs duty only upon satisfaction of the condition precedent: declaration of place of origin and production of a Certificate of Origin conforming to the Customs Tariff rules governing determination of origin under the India-Korea PTA. The Court found the Certificate's exporter declaration (Clause 12) and customs certification (Clause 13) demonstrated origin in the Republic of Korea, and that the Tribunal erred in treating the record as deficient. The matter is remitted insofar as necessary to the proper officer for verification consistent with the SC's findings and grant of benefit if origin is established.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.