TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order validating the assignment of tax dues by R2 to R1. The Tribunal held that tax liabilities must ordinarily be collected under the governing taxing statute and that once CIRP commenced and a moratorium under s.14 operates, direct execution is prohibited; nonetheless R2 lawfully filed and the RP collated a claim in Form B for the crystallised liability. Having assumed the status of Operational Creditor, R2 could validly assign its debt to R1 under the Code, and the assignment agreement (with reimbursement/discount provisions) was not impermissible. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order validating the assignment of tax dues by R2 to R1. The Tribunal held that tax liabilities must ordinarily be collected under the governing taxing statute and that once CIRP commenced and a moratorium under s.14 operates, direct execution is prohibited; nonetheless R2 lawfully filed and the RP collated a claim in Form B for the crystallised liability. Having assumed the status of Operational Creditor, R2 could validly assign its debt to R1 under the Code, and the assignment agreement (with reimbursement/discount provisions) was not impermissible. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
