Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petition and directed issuance of the discharge certificate under the SVLDR Scheme in favour of the Applicants. The Court held that SCNs remanded by CESTAT, which raised demands pending adjudication as of 30 June 2019, fall within "tax dues" and do not render declarations ineligible under Section 125(1)(a). Redemption fine-being a consequence of non-payment of excise duty and release of seized goods-is subsumed within duty/penalty for scheme purposes and is adjustable under the prescribed percentage payments under Section 129, with pre-deposits deductible but non-refundable. The Court concluded the Scheme's object of finality requires inclusion of redemption fine, and permit discharge certificates accordingly.
The HC allowed the petition and directed issuance of the discharge certificate under the SVLDR Scheme in favour of the Applicants. The Court held that SCNs remanded by CESTAT, which raised demands pending adjudication as of 30 June 2019, fall within "tax dues" and do not render declarations ineligible under Section 125(1)(a). Redemption fine-being a consequence of non-payment of excise duty and release of seized goods-is subsumed within duty/penalty for scheme purposes and is adjustable under the prescribed percentage payments under Section 129, with pre-deposits deductible but non-refundable. The Court concluded the Scheme's object of finality requires inclusion of redemption fine, and permit discharge certificates accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.