Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirmed that post-sale freight collected by a seller as reimbursement does not constitute "sale price" within the meaning of the statute; amounts representing freight, incurred to transport goods from factory gate to purchaser, were held to be reimbursable expenses rather than consideration for sale. The court endorsed earlier authority and upheld that parties may validly contract ex-factory sales where the seller initially pays freight and is reimbursed by the purchaser; such arrangements are not ipso facto sham. Challenges by the revenue alleging sham agreements were rejected, and references were disposed of by answering the posed question in favour of the assessee, resulting in relief to the respondent dealers.
The HC affirmed that post-sale freight collected by a seller as reimbursement does not constitute "sale price" within the meaning of the statute; amounts representing freight, incurred to transport goods from factory gate to purchaser, were held to be reimbursable expenses rather than consideration for sale. The court endorsed earlier authority and upheld that parties may validly contract ex-factory sales where the seller initially pays freight and is reimbursed by the purchaser; such arrangements are not ipso facto sham. Challenges by the revenue alleging sham agreements were rejected, and references were disposed of by answering the posed question in favour of the assessee, resulting in relief to the respondent dealers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
