Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT affirmed the Sales Tax App. Trib.'s order denying the appellant's stock-transfer claim and dismissed the appeal. The tribunal and CESTAT held that furnishing Form F does not create an irrebuttable presumption of branch transfer; under s.6A(2) the assessing authority is empowered to verify particulars in Form F, call for books and records and require proof of non-sale. The burden rests on the appellant to establish genuineness of alleged branch transfers. Evidence showed branch offices procured specific customer orders, instructed manufacture at the registered office, then collected and despatched goods to customers, constituting inter-State sales. No infirmity was found in the assessment for the relevant years.
CESTAT affirmed the Sales Tax App. Trib.'s order denying the appellant's stock-transfer claim and dismissed the appeal. The tribunal and CESTAT held that furnishing Form F does not create an irrebuttable presumption of branch transfer; under s.6A(2) the assessing authority is empowered to verify particulars in Form F, call for books and records and require proof of non-sale. The burden rests on the appellant to establish genuineness of alleged branch transfers. Evidence showed branch offices procured specific customer orders, instructed manufacture at the registered office, then collected and despatched goods to customers, constituting inter-State sales. No infirmity was found in the assessment for the relevant years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
