Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.