Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.