Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.