Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
HC held that limitation under Section 107 begins to run only from the date the order or decision is communicated to the assessee, not from mere uploading of the impugned order on the GSTN portal; statutory obligation to "communicate" is distinct from "serve" and requires actual imparting or transmission to the recipient, which unilateral portal upload does not satisfy absent proof of communication or receipt. The court clarified that there is no statutory duty on the assessee to access the portal and that section 169's service provisions are separate. The writ petition by the appellant was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.