Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC held that the demand raised under the GST Act for Financial Year 2021 is impermissible and the impugned Order-in-Original dated 26 February 2025 is quashed and set aside. Applying the principle that upon the Adjudicating Authority's approval of a resolution plan all claims not incorporated in the plan are extinguished, the Court found that any proceedings or demands predating the NCLT approval (11 August 2023) cannot be initiated or continued. Accordingly, the Respondent-Authority lacked jurisdiction to prosecute or levy a demand for the pre-approval period; the petition is allowed and the impugned order is declared void to the extent it relates to periods prior to the resolution-plan approval.
HC held that the demand raised under the GST Act for Financial Year 2021 is impermissible and the impugned Order-in-Original dated 26 February 2025 is quashed and set aside. Applying the principle that upon the Adjudicating Authority's approval of a resolution plan all claims not incorporated in the plan are extinguished, the Court found that any proceedings or demands predating the NCLT approval (11 August 2023) cannot be initiated or continued. Accordingly, the Respondent-Authority lacked jurisdiction to prosecute or levy a demand for the pre-approval period; the petition is allowed and the impugned order is declared void to the extent it relates to periods prior to the resolution-plan approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
