Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
HC held that the demand raised under the GST Act for Financial Year 2021 is impermissible and the impugned Order-in-Original dated 26 February 2025 is quashed and set aside. Applying the principle that upon the Adjudicating Authority's approval of a resolution plan all claims not incorporated in the plan are extinguished, the Court found that any proceedings or demands predating the NCLT approval (11 August 2023) cannot be initiated or continued. Accordingly, the Respondent-Authority lacked jurisdiction to prosecute or levy a demand for the pre-approval period; the petition is allowed and the impugned order is declared void to the extent it relates to periods prior to the resolution-plan approval.
HC held that the demand raised under the GST Act for Financial Year 2021 is impermissible and the impugned Order-in-Original dated 26 February 2025 is quashed and set aside. Applying the principle that upon the Adjudicating Authority's approval of a resolution plan all claims not incorporated in the plan are extinguished, the Court found that any proceedings or demands predating the NCLT approval (11 August 2023) cannot be initiated or continued. Accordingly, the Respondent-Authority lacked jurisdiction to prosecute or levy a demand for the pre-approval period; the petition is allowed and the impugned order is declared void to the extent it relates to periods prior to the resolution-plan approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
