Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
HC held that the demand raised under the GST Act for Financial Year 2021 is impermissible and the impugned Order-in-Original dated 26 February 2025 is quashed and set aside. Applying the principle that upon the Adjudicating Authority's approval of a resolution plan all claims not incorporated in the plan are extinguished, the Court found that any proceedings or demands predating the NCLT approval (11 August 2023) cannot be initiated or continued. Accordingly, the Respondent-Authority lacked jurisdiction to prosecute or levy a demand for the pre-approval period; the petition is allowed and the impugned order is declared void to the extent it relates to periods prior to the resolution-plan approval.
HC held that the demand raised under the GST Act for Financial Year 2021 is impermissible and the impugned Order-in-Original dated 26 February 2025 is quashed and set aside. Applying the principle that upon the Adjudicating Authority's approval of a resolution plan all claims not incorporated in the plan are extinguished, the Court found that any proceedings or demands predating the NCLT approval (11 August 2023) cannot be initiated or continued. Accordingly, the Respondent-Authority lacked jurisdiction to prosecute or levy a demand for the pre-approval period; the petition is allowed and the impugned order is declared void to the extent it relates to periods prior to the resolution-plan approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
