Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
HC set aside the impugned retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration and disposed of the petition. The court found the adjudicating authority failed to properly address the allegation of excess input tax credit and did not afford adequate consideration to the petitioner's written and oral explanations, raising natural justice concerns. Retrospective cancellation was held unsustainable in the absence of reasoned findings. The matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority to hear the petitioner, consider the stand on excess ITC, and pass a reasoned order addressing the petitioner's reply and oral submissions within a stipulated timeframe.
HC set aside the impugned retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration and disposed of the petition. The court found the adjudicating authority failed to properly address the allegation of excess input tax credit and did not afford adequate consideration to the petitioner's written and oral explanations, raising natural justice concerns. Retrospective cancellation was held unsustainable in the absence of reasoned findings. The matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority to hear the petitioner, consider the stand on excess ITC, and pass a reasoned order addressing the petitioner's reply and oral submissions within a stipulated timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.