Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
HC set aside the impugned retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration and disposed of the petition. The court found the adjudicating authority failed to properly address the allegation of excess input tax credit and did not afford adequate consideration to the petitioner's written and oral explanations, raising natural justice concerns. Retrospective cancellation was held unsustainable in the absence of reasoned findings. The matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority to hear the petitioner, consider the stand on excess ITC, and pass a reasoned order addressing the petitioner's reply and oral submissions within a stipulated timeframe.
HC set aside the impugned retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration and disposed of the petition. The court found the adjudicating authority failed to properly address the allegation of excess input tax credit and did not afford adequate consideration to the petitioner's written and oral explanations, raising natural justice concerns. Retrospective cancellation was held unsustainable in the absence of reasoned findings. The matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority to hear the petitioner, consider the stand on excess ITC, and pass a reasoned order addressing the petitioner's reply and oral submissions within a stipulated timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
