Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC dismissed the petition and directed that the petitioner's GST registration be cancelled with effect from 1 July 2020. The court found the sole ground for cancellation was continuous non-filing of returns for six months and noted proof of the proprietor's death by death certificate. The HC held that, because the show-cause notice did not allege retrospective cancellation, the impugned order could not operate retrospectively; accordingly retrospective cancellation was disallowed. In light of these findings, the HC ordered cancellation prospectively from 1 July 2020 and disposed of the petition.
The HC dismissed the petition and directed that the petitioner's GST registration be cancelled with effect from 1 July 2020. The court found the sole ground for cancellation was continuous non-filing of returns for six months and noted proof of the proprietor's death by death certificate. The HC held that, because the show-cause notice did not allege retrospective cancellation, the impugned order could not operate retrospectively; accordingly retrospective cancellation was disallowed. In light of these findings, the HC ordered cancellation prospectively from 1 July 2020 and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
