Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC dismissed the petition and directed that the petitioner's GST registration be cancelled with effect from 1 July 2020. The court found the sole ground for cancellation was continuous non-filing of returns for six months and noted proof of the proprietor's death by death certificate. The HC held that, because the show-cause notice did not allege retrospective cancellation, the impugned order could not operate retrospectively; accordingly retrospective cancellation was disallowed. In light of these findings, the HC ordered cancellation prospectively from 1 July 2020 and disposed of the petition.
The HC dismissed the petition and directed that the petitioner's GST registration be cancelled with effect from 1 July 2020. The court found the sole ground for cancellation was continuous non-filing of returns for six months and noted proof of the proprietor's death by death certificate. The HC held that, because the show-cause notice did not allege retrospective cancellation, the impugned order could not operate retrospectively; accordingly retrospective cancellation was disallowed. In light of these findings, the HC ordered cancellation prospectively from 1 July 2020 and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.