Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The HC dismissed the petition and directed that the petitioner's GST registration be cancelled with effect from 1 July 2020. The court found the sole ground for cancellation was continuous non-filing of returns for six months and noted proof of the proprietor's death by death certificate. The HC held that, because the show-cause notice did not allege retrospective cancellation, the impugned order could not operate retrospectively; accordingly retrospective cancellation was disallowed. In light of these findings, the HC ordered cancellation prospectively from 1 July 2020 and disposed of the petition.
The HC dismissed the petition and directed that the petitioner's GST registration be cancelled with effect from 1 July 2020. The court found the sole ground for cancellation was continuous non-filing of returns for six months and noted proof of the proprietor's death by death certificate. The HC held that, because the show-cause notice did not allege retrospective cancellation, the impugned order could not operate retrospectively; accordingly retrospective cancellation was disallowed. In light of these findings, the HC ordered cancellation prospectively from 1 July 2020 and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.