Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the issuance of a notice under s.148A(b) did not furnish a basis to reopen assessment where the reasons relied upon had already been considered by the AO in the original assessment order; an AO lacks jurisdiction to effectively review or revisit his concluded assessment by invoking reassessment proceedings under s.148 to reappreciate documents and explanations already placed on record. The Court emphasized that reassessment under s.148 cannot be used as a surrogate for review and that the power to re-examine completed assessments is not to be exercised intermittently. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner were quashed.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the issuance of a notice under s.148A(b) did not furnish a basis to reopen assessment where the reasons relied upon had already been considered by the AO in the original assessment order; an AO lacks jurisdiction to effectively review or revisit his concluded assessment by invoking reassessment proceedings under s.148 to reappreciate documents and explanations already placed on record. The Court emphasized that reassessment under s.148 cannot be used as a surrogate for review and that the power to re-examine completed assessments is not to be exercised intermittently. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
