Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the question whether Directorate of Revenue Intelligence officials qualify as "proper officers" under s.28 of the Customs Act has been authoritatively settled by the Supreme Court, obviating further adjudication on that issue; accordingly the impugned orders are set aside, the appeals are allowed and restored to their original positions before CESTAT for determination on merits, and the matters remitted to CESTAT for fresh adjudication. Appellants' challenges succeed to the extent indicated; any procedural or substantive issues not predicated on the "proper officer" point are to be decided by CESTAT in accordance with law.
The HC held that the question whether Directorate of Revenue Intelligence officials qualify as "proper officers" under s.28 of the Customs Act has been authoritatively settled by the Supreme Court, obviating further adjudication on that issue; accordingly the impugned orders are set aside, the appeals are allowed and restored to their original positions before CESTAT for determination on merits, and the matters remitted to CESTAT for fresh adjudication. Appellants' challenges succeed to the extent indicated; any procedural or substantive issues not predicated on the "proper officer" point are to be decided by CESTAT in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.