Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC dismissed the petitions as not pressed after counsel for the Petitioners informed the Court that CESTAT has held Section 134 of the Finance Act, 2023 was not notified under Section 1(2)(b) and hence the amendments to Sections 9, 9A and 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 have not come into effect, rendering the appeal maintainable before CESTAT; the Respondent did not contest that position. The Court recorded that the Petitioners may seek revival of the petitions if the legal position changes and accordingly disposed of the proceedings.
The HC dismissed the petitions as not pressed after counsel for the Petitioners informed the Court that CESTAT has held Section 134 of the Finance Act, 2023 was not notified under Section 1(2)(b) and hence the amendments to Sections 9, 9A and 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 have not come into effect, rendering the appeal maintainable before CESTAT; the Respondent did not contest that position. The Court recorded that the Petitioners may seek revival of the petitions if the legal position changes and accordingly disposed of the proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
