Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that the Commissioner's re-determination of assessable value was unsustainable as the premium addition was computed without objective, verifiable data contrary to Rule 10(2) of the CVR, 2007; the Clarksons Shipping Weekly data submitted by the appellant company is admissible and the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority to verify that data and redetermine freight, insurance and premium from the port of loading to NMP, then quantify differential duty. Confiscation of the goods is affirmed due to misdeclaration of country of origin. Penalty under s.112(a) CA, 1962 on the appellant company is sustained; imposition of penalty under s.114AA on the company is unwarranted and set aside. Personal penalty on the Vice President is set aside for lack of evidence. Appeal disposed by remand.
CESTAT held that the Commissioner's re-determination of assessable value was unsustainable as the premium addition was computed without objective, verifiable data contrary to Rule 10(2) of the CVR, 2007; the Clarksons Shipping Weekly data submitted by the appellant company is admissible and the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority to verify that data and redetermine freight, insurance and premium from the port of loading to NMP, then quantify differential duty. Confiscation of the goods is affirmed due to misdeclaration of country of origin. Penalty under s.112(a) CA, 1962 on the appellant company is sustained; imposition of penalty under s.114AA on the company is unwarranted and set aside. Personal penalty on the Vice President is set aside for lack of evidence. Appeal disposed by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
