Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the tribunal's order that the appellant materially breached the approved resolution plan by failing to pay the required upfront amount and subsequent instalments, resulting in non-implementation. The CoC had earlier contemplated liquidation but, upon the appellant's request, permitted submission of a fresh resolution plan which later secured 100% CoC approval. The record established the appellant lacked funds to meet the upfront fee, sought extensions twice, yet did not remit any amount within stipulated timelines. Given the appellant's repeated default and the reasoned findings below, the appellate challenge was devoid of merit and the impugned order refusing relief was affirmed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the tribunal's order that the appellant materially breached the approved resolution plan by failing to pay the required upfront amount and subsequent instalments, resulting in non-implementation. The CoC had earlier contemplated liquidation but, upon the appellant's request, permitted submission of a fresh resolution plan which later secured 100% CoC approval. The record established the appellant lacked funds to meet the upfront fee, sought extensions twice, yet did not remit any amount within stipulated timelines. Given the appellant's repeated default and the reasoned findings below, the appellate challenge was devoid of merit and the impugned order refusing relief was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
