Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT held that the provisional attachment of the immovable property in question was lawful and constituted a valid measure to preserve proceeds of crime. The tribunal found that Company X, in collusion with Bank Y and Individuals A and B, mortgaged third-party properties and submitted fabricated documents to obtain a Rs.15 crore factoring facility; funds were diverted for personal use, resulting in illegal gratification of Rs.50 lakhs to the appellant and misappropriation of approximately Rs.9 crores. Given these findings of commission of criminality and diversion of proceeds, there was no infirmity in attaching the flat; accordingly the appeal challenging the provisional attachment was dismissed and the order upheld.
AT held that the provisional attachment of the immovable property in question was lawful and constituted a valid measure to preserve proceeds of crime. The tribunal found that Company X, in collusion with Bank Y and Individuals A and B, mortgaged third-party properties and submitted fabricated documents to obtain a Rs.15 crore factoring facility; funds were diverted for personal use, resulting in illegal gratification of Rs.50 lakhs to the appellant and misappropriation of approximately Rs.9 crores. Given these findings of commission of criminality and diversion of proceeds, there was no infirmity in attaching the flat; accordingly the appeal challenging the provisional attachment was dismissed and the order upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
