Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the product manufactured under a valid drug licence is classifiable as a drug/medicine under Entry 19-A, Part II, Schedule II of the MPVAT Act, and not as a cosmetic/beauty product. The HC quashed the impugned orders of the Commercial Tax Appellate Board and the Commercial Tax Board that had reclassified the product under other Schedule entries, answered the legal questions in favour of the appellant, and directed that the appellant is not liable to pay interest under Section 18(1)(a) of the MPVAT Act. Both VAT appeals were allowed and the appeals disposed.
The HC held that the product manufactured under a valid drug licence is classifiable as a drug/medicine under Entry 19-A, Part II, Schedule II of the MPVAT Act, and not as a cosmetic/beauty product. The HC quashed the impugned orders of the Commercial Tax Appellate Board and the Commercial Tax Board that had reclassified the product under other Schedule entries, answered the legal questions in favour of the appellant, and directed that the appellant is not liable to pay interest under Section 18(1)(a) of the MPVAT Act. Both VAT appeals were allowed and the appeals disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.