Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petitions, holding the appeals were instituted within the extended limitation and therefore not time-barred. The court set aside the impugned orders and restored the petitioners' appeals to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law. The HC relied on a comparable Division Bench decision of Patna HC which observed that the notification relied upon predated the purported cut-off, undermining any rationale for denying filing on the ground of limitation. Consequently, the petitions were allowed and the matter remitted for reconsideration by the appellate authority.
The HC allowed the petitions, holding the appeals were instituted within the extended limitation and therefore not time-barred. The court set aside the impugned orders and restored the petitioners' appeals to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law. The HC relied on a comparable Division Bench decision of Patna HC which observed that the notification relied upon predated the purported cut-off, undermining any rationale for denying filing on the ground of limitation. Consequently, the petitions were allowed and the matter remitted for reconsideration by the appellate authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.