Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The AAR held that the applicant is entitled to claim input tax credit of IGST paid on import of goods even where payment to the foreign supplier was deferred beyond 180 days from invoice but made within FEMA/RBI timelines. The Authority concluded that such ITC remains admissible under Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 and is not liable to reversal under the second proviso to Section 16(2) read with Rule 37, since IGST was discharged at customs thereby protecting revenue and creating a situation analogous to reverse charge supplies (which fall under the proviso's exclusion). The decision rests on legislative intent reflected in GST Council recommendations.
The AAR held that the applicant is entitled to claim input tax credit of IGST paid on import of goods even where payment to the foreign supplier was deferred beyond 180 days from invoice but made within FEMA/RBI timelines. The Authority concluded that such ITC remains admissible under Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 and is not liable to reversal under the second proviso to Section 16(2) read with Rule 37, since IGST was discharged at customs thereby protecting revenue and creating a situation analogous to reverse charge supplies (which fall under the proviso's exclusion). The decision rests on legislative intent reflected in GST Council recommendations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
