Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be sustained where the AO failed to form the requisite subjective satisfaction that the assessee concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The AO's ad-hoc estimation limiting profit in purchases to 12.5% and implicit acceptance of sales invoices precluded a finding of deliberate concealment or fabrication of records. Because penalty provisions are penal and require strict construction, initiation of penalty proceedings based solely on re-opening additions without clear material demonstrating intentional concealment was impermissible. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the penalty under s.271(1)(c) was set aside.
The HC held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be sustained where the AO failed to form the requisite subjective satisfaction that the assessee concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The AO's ad-hoc estimation limiting profit in purchases to 12.5% and implicit acceptance of sales invoices precluded a finding of deliberate concealment or fabrication of records. Because penalty provisions are penal and require strict construction, initiation of penalty proceedings based solely on re-opening additions without clear material demonstrating intentional concealment was impermissible. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the penalty under s.271(1)(c) was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.