Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be sustained where the AO failed to form the requisite subjective satisfaction that the assessee concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The AO's ad-hoc estimation limiting profit in purchases to 12.5% and implicit acceptance of sales invoices precluded a finding of deliberate concealment or fabrication of records. Because penalty provisions are penal and require strict construction, initiation of penalty proceedings based solely on re-opening additions without clear material demonstrating intentional concealment was impermissible. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the penalty under s.271(1)(c) was set aside.
The HC held that penalty under s.271(1)(c) could not be sustained where the AO failed to form the requisite subjective satisfaction that the assessee concealed particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The AO's ad-hoc estimation limiting profit in purchases to 12.5% and implicit acceptance of sales invoices precluded a finding of deliberate concealment or fabrication of records. Because penalty provisions are penal and require strict construction, initiation of penalty proceedings based solely on re-opening additions without clear material demonstrating intentional concealment was impermissible. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the penalty under s.271(1)(c) was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.