Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the appellant satisfied statutory prerequisites for accumulation under section 11(2) and for investment under section 11(5). The assessee had set apart Rs.95,00,000 for charitable purposes, filed Form 10 within time, and held the amount in a scheduled bank on 31.03.2018, subsequently investing in bank FDRs on 07.04.2018 and 09.04.2018. With no misapplication or deviation from trust objects, a brief post-year-end placement in prescribed modes did not warrant denial of exemption. The tribunal construed sections 11(2) and 11(5) harmoniously to promote legislative intent, held the procedural disallowance unjustified, and allowed the appeal.
ITAT held that the appellant satisfied statutory prerequisites for accumulation under section 11(2) and for investment under section 11(5). The assessee had set apart Rs.95,00,000 for charitable purposes, filed Form 10 within time, and held the amount in a scheduled bank on 31.03.2018, subsequently investing in bank FDRs on 07.04.2018 and 09.04.2018. With no misapplication or deviation from trust objects, a brief post-year-end placement in prescribed modes did not warrant denial of exemption. The tribunal construed sections 11(2) and 11(5) harmoniously to promote legislative intent, held the procedural disallowance unjustified, and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
