Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the notice under section 148 was unsigned and therefore void ab initio; consequentially the reassessment proceedings and the assessment framed thereon were quashed and unsustainable. The Tribunal found the AO failed to verify the assessee's evidences, did not identify specific defects, and neglected to issue statutory summons under section 133(6) to relevant purchasers; reliance on unexamined assertions rendered the additions unjustified. Investments traced to earlier assessment years, previously accepted by the department, could not be reopened in the year of sale without valid grounds. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the reassessment order set aside.
ITAT held that the notice under section 148 was unsigned and therefore void ab initio; consequentially the reassessment proceedings and the assessment framed thereon were quashed and unsustainable. The Tribunal found the AO failed to verify the assessee's evidences, did not identify specific defects, and neglected to issue statutory summons under section 133(6) to relevant purchasers; reliance on unexamined assertions rendered the additions unjustified. Investments traced to earlier assessment years, previously accepted by the department, could not be reopened in the year of sale without valid grounds. The appeal of the assessee was allowed and the reassessment order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.