Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld the appellate authority's deletion of an addition under s.69A read with s.115BBE, concluding the assessee satisfactorily explained cash deposits (approx. Rs.39.84 crore) as receipts from its educational and medical activities and redeposits from bank withdrawals. The Tribunal found the AO made no cogent enquiry, did not reject the books of account, and the receipts were reflected in the assessee's gross receipts and audited accounts; consequently the impugned addition amounted to double taxation on disclosed receipts. ITAT refused remand, held the evidentiary materials placed before the AO had been duly considered by CIT(A), and affirmed deletion of the addition. Decision pronounced against the revenue.
ITAT upheld the appellate authority's deletion of an addition under s.69A read with s.115BBE, concluding the assessee satisfactorily explained cash deposits (approx. Rs.39.84 crore) as receipts from its educational and medical activities and redeposits from bank withdrawals. The Tribunal found the AO made no cogent enquiry, did not reject the books of account, and the receipts were reflected in the assessee's gross receipts and audited accounts; consequently the impugned addition amounted to double taxation on disclosed receipts. ITAT refused remand, held the evidentiary materials placed before the AO had been duly considered by CIT(A), and affirmed deletion of the addition. Decision pronounced against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
