Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to adopt the enhanced FMV of Rs. 5,00,000 per acre for computation of capital gains and to recalibrate tax relief accordingly; the tribunal held that the AO erred in relying on the earlier FMV of Rs. 3,50,000. The ITAT also held that exclusion from exemption under s.54F(4) was inapplicable where the assessee invested the sums in construction of a residential property within the relevant period and maintained the funds in a nationalized bank pending disbursement, notwithstanding non-deposit in the CGAS and earlier allowance under s.54B. Deduction under section 54F was accordingly allowed.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to adopt the enhanced FMV of Rs. 5,00,000 per acre for computation of capital gains and to recalibrate tax relief accordingly; the tribunal held that the AO erred in relying on the earlier FMV of Rs. 3,50,000. The ITAT also held that exclusion from exemption under s.54F(4) was inapplicable where the assessee invested the sums in construction of a residential property within the relevant period and maintained the funds in a nationalized bank pending disbursement, notwithstanding non-deposit in the CGAS and earlier allowance under s.54B. Deduction under section 54F was accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.