Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal directed the authority to consider the binding Mad. HC Division Bench view that delayed refunds attract interest under s.27A of the Customs Act, unless and until the Division Bench stay is vacated or the SC determines the point of law. The original authority must re-examine the claim in light of the Mad. HC pronouncement and relevant board instructions, afford the appellant a time-bound opportunity for oral and written submissions, and pass a speaking, reasoned order applying appropriate provisions of the Customs Act and principles of natural justice. Appeal disposed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal directed the authority to consider the binding Mad. HC Division Bench view that delayed refunds attract interest under s.27A of the Customs Act, unless and until the Division Bench stay is vacated or the SC determines the point of law. The original authority must re-examine the claim in light of the Mad. HC pronouncement and relevant board instructions, afford the appellant a time-bound opportunity for oral and written submissions, and pass a speaking, reasoned order applying appropriate provisions of the Customs Act and principles of natural justice. Appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.