Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC set aside the NCLAT order that had dismissed the appellant's challenge to proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC for a 176-day refiling delay, condoning the delay and restoring the appeal to its original number for adjudication on merits. The Court held that the appellant must be afforded an opportunity to prefer an appeal against Section 9 proceedings. The SC retained the two cost orders previously imposed (one by the NCLT and one by the NCLAT) and imposed an additional cost of Rs.5 lakh, otherwise directing the matter to proceed in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed of.
The SC set aside the NCLAT order that had dismissed the appellant's challenge to proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC for a 176-day refiling delay, condoning the delay and restoring the appeal to its original number for adjudication on merits. The Court held that the appellant must be afforded an opportunity to prefer an appeal against Section 9 proceedings. The SC retained the two cost orders previously imposed (one by the NCLT and one by the NCLAT) and imposed an additional cost of Rs.5 lakh, otherwise directing the matter to proceed in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.