Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
HC quashed the impugned order insofar as it adjudicated the petitioners' claim for input tax credit as time-barred under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, while recognizing entitlement where claims fall within the temporal window prescribed by Section 16(5). The respondent department is restrained from initiating or pursuing any proceedings against the petitioner premised solely on the limitation issue addressed by the order. The court directed the respondent to take immediate steps to de-freeze the petitioners' bank accounts affected by the impugned order. The writ petition is allowed, with the relief confined to the limitation question and ancillary de-freezing relief.
HC quashed the impugned order insofar as it adjudicated the petitioners' claim for input tax credit as time-barred under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, while recognizing entitlement where claims fall within the temporal window prescribed by Section 16(5). The respondent department is restrained from initiating or pursuing any proceedings against the petitioner premised solely on the limitation issue addressed by the order. The court directed the respondent to take immediate steps to de-freeze the petitioners' bank accounts affected by the impugned order. The writ petition is allowed, with the relief confined to the limitation question and ancillary de-freezing relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
