Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC refused interim relief under Section 74 of the W.B.G.S.T./C.G.S.T. Act, 2017, noting alleged suppression of facts to evade tax. The court declined interim protection and directed that Rs. 5,50,62,464, which the appellants/petitioners assert was paid under compulsion but which the Revenue disputes, shall be treated as a deposit and shall abide by the final adjudicatory orders in the writ petition. Observing that over 50% of the tax demand has already been recovered, the court held the Revenue's interest is adequately protected and that the payment exceeds the 10% deposit ordinarily required on appeal, reinforcing treatment as a deposit. The writ petition is listed before the appropriate Bench on 28 November 2025.
HC refused interim relief under Section 74 of the W.B.G.S.T./C.G.S.T. Act, 2017, noting alleged suppression of facts to evade tax. The court declined interim protection and directed that Rs. 5,50,62,464, which the appellants/petitioners assert was paid under compulsion but which the Revenue disputes, shall be treated as a deposit and shall abide by the final adjudicatory orders in the writ petition. Observing that over 50% of the tax demand has already been recovered, the court held the Revenue's interest is adequately protected and that the payment exceeds the 10% deposit ordinarily required on appeal, reinforcing treatment as a deposit. The writ petition is listed before the appropriate Bench on 28 November 2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
