Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The writ petition filed by the petitioner against the first respondent is dismissed. The HC held the impugned order was challenged on grounds of limitation under s.28 of the Customs Act and on alleged non-consideration of departmental sample test reports, but found these to raise disputed questions of fact and mixed law requiring fact-finding. Such issues fall within the statutory appellate remit under s.129A and are not amenable to writ relief under Article 226. The petitioner, having subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the officer in Maharashtra, cannot invoke a different HC forum; the appropriate remedy is appeal before the designated appellate authority. Accordingly, the writ is rejected.
The writ petition filed by the petitioner against the first respondent is dismissed. The HC held the impugned order was challenged on grounds of limitation under s.28 of the Customs Act and on alleged non-consideration of departmental sample test reports, but found these to raise disputed questions of fact and mixed law requiring fact-finding. Such issues fall within the statutory appellate remit under s.129A and are not amenable to writ relief under Article 226. The petitioner, having subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the officer in Maharashtra, cannot invoke a different HC forum; the appropriate remedy is appeal before the designated appellate authority. Accordingly, the writ is rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
