Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT upheld that the resolution professional's layoff notice during CIRP resulted in cessation of work by the appellant workmen and, as a consequence, they are not entitled to any post-layoff dues except as expressly provided in the approved resolution plan. The Tribunal held that an approved resolution plan is binding on all stakeholders and, absent its setting aside, its terms govern entitlement. It further concluded the adjudicating authority lacked jurisdiction to entertain a challenge to the layoff notice dated 01.02.2020. Finding no illegality in the impugned order, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed that any entitlement of the workmen arises solely from provisions, if any, in the approved resolution plan.
The NCLAT upheld that the resolution professional's layoff notice during CIRP resulted in cessation of work by the appellant workmen and, as a consequence, they are not entitled to any post-layoff dues except as expressly provided in the approved resolution plan. The Tribunal held that an approved resolution plan is binding on all stakeholders and, absent its setting aside, its terms govern entitlement. It further concluded the adjudicating authority lacked jurisdiction to entertain a challenge to the layoff notice dated 01.02.2020. Finding no illegality in the impugned order, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed that any entitlement of the workmen arises solely from provisions, if any, in the approved resolution plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
