Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that additions and enhancements made by the AO and affirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) in respect of alleged undisclosed receipts and PoCM accruals are unsustainable. Diary entries seized from a director's premises partly related to a separate developer and, absent independent corroboration or statements enabling identification, cannot support additions founded on suspicion. The AO's 20% advance-based revenue recognition addition and enhancements premised on purported statements u/s 132(4) fail for lack of admissible corroborative material and absence of a show-cause opportunity as required by s. 251(2). The PoCM computations submitted by the assessee were not controverted; accordingly ITAT directed reversal of impugned additions and quashed the enhancements.
ITAT held that additions and enhancements made by the AO and affirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) in respect of alleged undisclosed receipts and PoCM accruals are unsustainable. Diary entries seized from a director's premises partly related to a separate developer and, absent independent corroboration or statements enabling identification, cannot support additions founded on suspicion. The AO's 20% advance-based revenue recognition addition and enhancements premised on purported statements u/s 132(4) fail for lack of admissible corroborative material and absence of a show-cause opportunity as required by s. 251(2). The PoCM computations submitted by the assessee were not controverted; accordingly ITAT directed reversal of impugned additions and quashed the enhancements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.