Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT held that additions and enhancements made by the AO and affirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) in respect of alleged undisclosed receipts and PoCM accruals are unsustainable. Diary entries seized from a director's premises partly related to a separate developer and, absent independent corroboration or statements enabling identification, cannot support additions founded on suspicion. The AO's 20% advance-based revenue recognition addition and enhancements premised on purported statements u/s 132(4) fail for lack of admissible corroborative material and absence of a show-cause opportunity as required by s. 251(2). The PoCM computations submitted by the assessee were not controverted; accordingly ITAT directed reversal of impugned additions and quashed the enhancements.
ITAT held that additions and enhancements made by the AO and affirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) in respect of alleged undisclosed receipts and PoCM accruals are unsustainable. Diary entries seized from a director's premises partly related to a separate developer and, absent independent corroboration or statements enabling identification, cannot support additions founded on suspicion. The AO's 20% advance-based revenue recognition addition and enhancements premised on purported statements u/s 132(4) fail for lack of admissible corroborative material and absence of a show-cause opportunity as required by s. 251(2). The PoCM computations submitted by the assessee were not controverted; accordingly ITAT directed reversal of impugned additions and quashed the enhancements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.