Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the application to transfer the winding-up proceeding against the respondent company to the NCLT under s.434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, concluding that no irreversible steps toward liquidation have occurred (no sale of movable or immovable assets) and that substantial creditor claims remain unresolved. The court exercised its discretionary jurisdiction in line with the IBC's creditor-driven, time-bound insolvency framework, noting the Official Liquidator's ongoing claims scrutiny and depletion of the common pool by preservation costs. Given the absence of irreversible actions and the availability of the IBC mechanism to address creditor interests and alleged fraudulent transactions, transfer for adjudication under the IBC was directed.
The HC allowed the application to transfer the winding-up proceeding against the respondent company to the NCLT under s.434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, concluding that no irreversible steps toward liquidation have occurred (no sale of movable or immovable assets) and that substantial creditor claims remain unresolved. The court exercised its discretionary jurisdiction in line with the IBC's creditor-driven, time-bound insolvency framework, noting the Official Liquidator's ongoing claims scrutiny and depletion of the common pool by preservation costs. Given the absence of irreversible actions and the availability of the IBC mechanism to address creditor interests and alleged fraudulent transactions, transfer for adjudication under the IBC was directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
