Central Government rescinds 2017 notification creating 4.05-hectare SEZ at Ameenpur after developer de-notification request; state no-objection confir...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10901 to 10920 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal in part, holding that interest under s.234B cannot be levied beyond the date on which the tax liability was discharged (30.04.2023); accordingly, excess interest computed by the CPC up to the date of processing of the return was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s conclusion that a particular payment had been correctly characterized by the CPC as a payment under s.140B(1) of the Act, finding no infirmity in that determination; that aspect of the assessment was therefore upheld against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal in part, holding that interest under s.234B cannot be levied beyond the date on which the tax liability was discharged (30.04.2023); accordingly, excess interest computed by the CPC up to the date of processing of the return was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s conclusion that a particular payment had been correctly characterized by the CPC as a payment under s.140B(1) of the Act, finding no infirmity in that determination; that aspect of the assessment was therefore upheld against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
