Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held the reopening of assessment under s.147/s.148 invalid, finding the AO's action amounted to impermissible change of opinion as no fresh material surfaced post-assessment and the original return and notes were fully considered; the sanction by the CIT(A) was mechanical ("yes, I am satisfied") and therefore vitiated, so the reassessment proceedings and notice under s.148 are quashed. Separately, the Tribunal upheld the assessee's accounting treatment of goodwill under the purchase method for computation of book profit under s.115JB, directing the AO to delete adjustments and allow amortisation/depreciation on goodwill as reflected in the approved merger scheme and audited financials.
ITAT held the reopening of assessment under s.147/s.148 invalid, finding the AO's action amounted to impermissible change of opinion as no fresh material surfaced post-assessment and the original return and notes were fully considered; the sanction by the CIT(A) was mechanical ("yes, I am satisfied") and therefore vitiated, so the reassessment proceedings and notice under s.148 are quashed. Separately, the Tribunal upheld the assessee's accounting treatment of goodwill under the purchase method for computation of book profit under s.115JB, directing the AO to delete adjustments and allow amortisation/depreciation on goodwill as reflected in the approved merger scheme and audited financials.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.