Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the batch of revision petitions and upheld the trial court's order under Section 148 of the NI Act requiring deposit, holding that such a direction may be mandatory and, if non-compliance would foreclose an appellant's right of appeal, it terminates proceedings and thereby may be challenged by revision before the HC. The court held that the applicability of Sections 397(2) CrPC and 438(2) BNSS does not bar such challenge. The HC applied a prima facie standard of scrutiny to the deposit direction, finding the trial court recorded rival contentions and legal reasoning; further factual re-appreciation was precluded, and no illegality was shown.
The HC dismissed the batch of revision petitions and upheld the trial court's order under Section 148 of the NI Act requiring deposit, holding that such a direction may be mandatory and, if non-compliance would foreclose an appellant's right of appeal, it terminates proceedings and thereby may be challenged by revision before the HC. The court held that the applicability of Sections 397(2) CrPC and 438(2) BNSS does not bar such challenge. The HC applied a prima facie standard of scrutiny to the deposit direction, finding the trial court recorded rival contentions and legal reasoning; further factual re-appreciation was precluded, and no illegality was shown.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
