Central Government rescinds 2017 notification creating 4.05-hectare SEZ at Ameenpur after developer de-notification request; state no-objection confir...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10901 to 10920 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed Revenue's legal contention that documents seized from a third party could be considered in proceedings under s.153A where the assessee was also a searched person, holding s.153C inapplicable to that extent and setting aside the CIT(A)'s exclusion of such documents. However, on merits the Tribunal dismissed Revenue's additions under s.69B for completed assessments where no incriminating material was seized from the assessee's premises, finding the AO relied solely on third-party papers and granting relief to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld deletion of disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) for lack of objective material and accepted the CIT(A)'s telescoping of land-investment additions, rejecting Revenue's broader challenge.
The ITAT allowed Revenue's legal contention that documents seized from a third party could be considered in proceedings under s.153A where the assessee was also a searched person, holding s.153C inapplicable to that extent and setting aside the CIT(A)'s exclusion of such documents. However, on merits the Tribunal dismissed Revenue's additions under s.69B for completed assessments where no incriminating material was seized from the assessee's premises, finding the AO relied solely on third-party papers and granting relief to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld deletion of disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) for lack of objective material and accepted the CIT(A)'s telescoping of land-investment additions, rejecting Revenue's broader challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
