Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed that the deduction claimed under sec.57 be permitted. The Tribunal held that the AO erred in denying the deduction by overlooking that the interest income arose from surplus funds in the assessee's savings account and fixed deposits funded by loan proceeds, and that the requisite nexus between expenditure and income was established. The Tribunal rejected the AO's contention that rotational loan movements within the partnership vitiated the claim, finding no disallowance warranted on that basis. The relief was granted on the specific factual matrix of the case, the Tribunal emphasising that its view is confined to these peculiar facts and is not to be treated as a precedent.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and directed that the deduction claimed under sec.57 be permitted. The Tribunal held that the AO erred in denying the deduction by overlooking that the interest income arose from surplus funds in the assessee's savings account and fixed deposits funded by loan proceeds, and that the requisite nexus between expenditure and income was established. The Tribunal rejected the AO's contention that rotational loan movements within the partnership vitiated the claim, finding no disallowance warranted on that basis. The relief was granted on the specific factual matrix of the case, the Tribunal emphasising that its view is confined to these peculiar facts and is not to be treated as a precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.