Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT affirmed the quantum disallowance of unpaid leave encashment under the governing statutory framework, but allowed the appeal against imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal held the deduction claim was governed by section 43B(f) and upheld the CIT(A)'s disallowance in the quantum proceedings; however, it found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars warranting penalty, noting the assessee had disclosed the amount in audited accounts, relied on prevailing judicial views then favorable to the assessee, and acted bona fide while litigation was pending before the SC. The ITAT set aside the impugned appellate order and directed the AO to delete the penalty.
ITAT affirmed the quantum disallowance of unpaid leave encashment under the governing statutory framework, but allowed the appeal against imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal held the deduction claim was governed by section 43B(f) and upheld the CIT(A)'s disallowance in the quantum proceedings; however, it found no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars warranting penalty, noting the assessee had disclosed the amount in audited accounts, relied on prevailing judicial views then favorable to the assessee, and acted bona fide while litigation was pending before the SC. The ITAT set aside the impugned appellate order and directed the AO to delete the penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
