Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld admission of a Section 7 petition, finding that the security trustee was duly authorized to initiate insolvency proceedings following assignment of the loan to an asset reconstruction entity. The Tribunal held that authorization was both pleaded and proved by the security trustee under the trusteeship agreement and by subsequent written authorization from the assignor, so the trustee had locus standi to file under Section 7. The Tribunal further affirmed initiation of CIRP against the corporate guarantors, noting prior dismissal of related appeals challenging CIRP against the principal borrower(s). The appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed.
NCLAT upheld admission of a Section 7 petition, finding that the security trustee was duly authorized to initiate insolvency proceedings following assignment of the loan to an asset reconstruction entity. The Tribunal held that authorization was both pleaded and proved by the security trustee under the trusteeship agreement and by subsequent written authorization from the assignor, so the trustee had locus standi to file under Section 7. The Tribunal further affirmed initiation of CIRP against the corporate guarantors, noting prior dismissal of related appeals challenging CIRP against the principal borrower(s). The appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
