Central Government rescinds 2017 notification creating 4.05-hectare SEZ at Ameenpur after developer de-notification request; state no-objection confir...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10901 to 10920 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that the appeal is partly allowed. Service tax liability on civil construction and site-levelling services rendered to the national electric transmission utility was found exempt under the relevant notifications; however, when that exemption ceased the appellant voluntarily discharged the tax and interest, negating the need for a showcause notice and attracting no penalty. The Tribunal set aside the confirmed demand in respect of construction/repair of an approach road, observing the project qualified for statutory exemption for roads for public use and rejecting the revenue's challenge to a PSU certificate. The Tribunal also quashed the service tax demand on construction of a railway line, finding the adjudicator's reliance misplaced; appeal disposed.
CESTAT held that the appeal is partly allowed. Service tax liability on civil construction and site-levelling services rendered to the national electric transmission utility was found exempt under the relevant notifications; however, when that exemption ceased the appellant voluntarily discharged the tax and interest, negating the need for a showcause notice and attracting no penalty. The Tribunal set aside the confirmed demand in respect of construction/repair of an approach road, observing the project qualified for statutory exemption for roads for public use and rejecting the revenue's challenge to a PSU certificate. The Tribunal also quashed the service tax demand on construction of a railway line, finding the adjudicator's reliance misplaced; appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.